Editorial & Data Standards
The standard for an OGadget page is practical: the application should do a useful job, and its explanation should tell you what it can support. A familiar product name, a plausible number or a polished interface is not evidence that the underlying information is correct.
Original work with an identifiable function
An available tool should carry out the operation described on its page. Its text should explain that operation rather than repeat a generic description of technology. We do not count a proposed interface as finished functionality or turn an unanswered question into a factual claim just to fill a field.
The guide, inputs and displayed result should agree. If a calculator uses an assumption, the surrounding copy must not describe the output as a measurement taken from your device.
Sources need to support the particular claim
For product and platform information, the preferred starting point is the manufacturer, platform documentation or another primary source for the detail in question. A source supporting a model’s existence may not support a performance figure, regional price or compatibility statement.
Source links and verification dates help you see what was checked. They do not mean a page is monitored continuously. A date should identify a real review or update, not change automatically just to make old information appear fresh.
When sources disagree, the affected claim needs a narrower description or a clear indication that the issue is unresolved. Missing information should remain missing. We do not silently substitute a specification from an older product or game.
Calculations are not sourced facts
A formula can be correct while its inputs are uncertain. Calculators should identify units, show the method and use examples that can be checked. Prefilled values are examples unless the page explicitly identifies their source and status.
Estimates should stay labeled as estimates. A download-time scenario is not a promise about a store’s transfer rate. A relative microphone level is not a calibrated sound-pressure measurement. A person’s completion mark is not independent proof of an achievement.
Game information and personal workspaces
GTA 6 applications separate confirmed information in a dated source snapshot from assumptions and personal entries. Some functions are useful before complete game data exists: a user can budget a hypothetical installation, build a checklist or annotate a permitted map image.
That does not justify inventing official installation sizes, mission lists, collectible locations, prices, performance figures or trophy requirements. Partial catalogs must be identified as partial. A source URL added by a user does not promote a personal record into the curated snapshot.
OGadget is independent of Rockstar Games and other game publishers. Their names and trademarks identify the products discussed; they do not indicate sponsorship, endorsement or access to a publisher’s internal data.
AI assistance and verification
AI-assisted development and drafting are part of how OGadget is built. The use of an assistant does not establish that a specification is true, a formula is correct or a feature works. Those questions need evidence from the relevant source, implementation or test.
Testing claims should name the kind of check actually performed. A calculation test, a browser interaction and a visual viewport check answer different questions. The scope of a check matters: it does not establish that every device, browser or use case has been covered.
Corrections and meaningful updates
Reports are assessed against the page’s stated method and the evidence available. A reproducible bug may need a code change; an outdated specification may need a source update. A missing database field may need an explicit limitation rather than a guessed replacement.
Substantive corrections should make the changed information clear, with a dated note where the change affects how earlier results or statements should be understood. Small spelling and layout fixes do not need to be presented as a new data verification.
Use Corrections & Feedback to report a problem. These standards describe the rules for the work, not a claim that mistakes never occur.